On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:45:24 +0800
Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:49:01 +0200 (CEST)
Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
>>List of things we have thought of include in a Squid-2.6 release
>>include
>>
So what's about to make 2.6 C++ conformable ? The thing that I
supposed as first thing to do before migation to C++ and 3.0
Why? Squid-2.6 isn't being migrated to C++.. :P
(a) it is possible to use "C++ as C" and there are some resons for
this - more strict syntax etc.
(b) compatibilty with 3.0 reasons. As I have see there were a number
of parrallel patches to 2.5 and 3.0
SY,
EK
Adrian
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
