On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:29 +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 22:02 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > > That is good, but I do not think we should require it. Cppunit is a > > developer tool. "Make check" is a user-level reassurance that the > > package was built correctly. ... > I think you should decide to either: > - keep cppunit in the source tree > or > - have make check fail when its not installed.
I caught up with Alex to discuss this on IRC, we didn't come to much in
the way of agreement. One thing we did agree on was:
14:56 < lifeless> I was trying to say that 'removing cppunit's source
from the squid codebase' != changing squid to have make check not
error when cppunit is not available.
14:57 * alexx agrees that removing and changing "make check" are
different steps/issues.
So I'd like to ask that the change made to remove cppunit's source from
the code base *NOT* change the current behaviour that 'make check'
*depends* on libcppunit being available.
That will let the current bug be closed and is apparently
non-contentious.
-Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
