Hello,
I see thousands of these messages on busy caches:
> 2011/11/07 05:16:23 kid1| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest:
> abandoning FD 6650
> 2011/11/07 05:16:27 kid3| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest:
> abandoning FD 9180
> 2011/11/07 05:16:28 kid5| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest:
> abandoning FD 6361
> 2011/11/07 05:16:28 kid6| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest:
> abandoning FD 3322
> 2011/11/07 05:16:31 kid2| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest:
> abandoning FD 7809
> 2011/11/07 05:16:32 kid3| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest:
> abandoning FD 121
The code says:
> // XXX: Can this happen? CONNECT tunnels have deferredRequest set.
> debugs(33, DBG_IMPORTANT, HERE << "abandoning " << conn->clientConnection);
So, the answer to that XXX question is "yes, it can happen", at least in
older v3.2 code. Does anybody know whether there were any recent changes
that were meant to address the above?
Can we raise the debugging level away from DBG_IMPORTANT now that we
know the answer?
Thank you,
Alex.
