On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 10:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > At the end of the day, I'd rather see something that an increasing number of > people > on the Internet will use and - I won't lie here - whatever creates a self > sustaining > project, both from community and financial perspectives.
I agree with this. FWIW I see squid 2 and 3 as very similar to apache 1.x and 2.x - apache 2 took a _long_ time to be considered an 'upgrade' by _all_ users, and squid3 has been in the same boat. I don't think that the amount of work to make squid3 better for all users is insurmountable by the community, and I think that continuing the polish on squid3 is the best way forward. YMMV of course :). -Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
