On 05/03/2011 06:40, christ...@wanxp.com wrote:
On 2/5/2011 11:26 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 05/03/2011 06:16, christ...@wanxp.com wrote:
Dear,
i installed and run 2 squid2.7 in same machine for balance CPU load
(quadcore proc). my question are can i do sibling between 2 squid in
same machine for sharing cache ? will it cause any problem in future
? any1 have experience bout this issue ?
Regards,
Kristian
it seems like a good idea.
if you will bind every squid instance to other ip address or you cand
bind each one of them to a loopback interface with a mask of 32 bit
i think you can manage theoretically to make it work.
i never tried it and if it can work then i think i will do some use
of this.
but my question is: how do i bind an instance to a specific cpu\core?
Dear,
i`m not expert for this issue but i think we cant specific the core
for squid. it will run automaticly. 1 squid only can take 1 core. if i
run 2 squid it will take 2 core ( using command "top" to view ).
i tried SIBLING (htcp) and it worked , but i just want to know will it
cause any trouble like unlimited loopback or memory leak or something
like that. i hope any1 can explain it better for me.
Regards,
Kristian
What do you mean by unlimited loopback? if it works then i think
loopback is your last problem.
as far as i understand memory leaks will stay the same with one instance
and two.
i understand you compiled them yourself to make the instances with
different settings? directories? etc..
Thanks Eliezer
