Are you using newest 3.0 ? (git checkout)
I remember I once also had a problem with PVs which had stored old values, but I can not remember naymore which PV it was.

regards
klaus

Am 11.05.2010 14:59, schrieb Andreas Granig:
Hi,

Some interesting behavior with kam-3.0, which I haven't experienced with
<= 1.5:

Let's say I have two subscribers A and B registered. A has a
received-value in location table, B has it set to NULL.

If I call lookup() for A, $ru is set to the registered contact, and $du
is set to the received-value. When for example A is busy, I catch it
with a failure route and rewrite $ru to B. Calling lookup() again sets
my $ru to the contact of B, but since the received-value of B is NULL in
the DB, the $du is still pointing to the received-value of A, instead of
being set to null.

A quick-fix is to set $du to null before calling lookup(), but I'm
wondering if this is a bug or intended behavior?

Thanks,
Andreas

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to