Harry,
I am not sure using the ball diameter is quite as accurate as using the
diameter of the opening that the ball sits on? I can put any number of
different sized balls on the same seat size. The article that I am still
looking for, was written in the 1930's by Carl Purinton in the
Modelmaker Magazine, published by Spon & Chamberline in New York City. I
believe that during the period of time that L. Lawrence was living on
the estate of Calvert Holt, in Greenwich, Connecticut, the three of them
did a lot of research of such matters as the optimal lift of check
valves, area of the safety valve seat as a function of grate size. Even
the area of the exhaust nozzle to the swept volume of the cylinders. My
problem is in finding that particular issues the have the results of
their testing.
In Martin Evans text on designing Model Steam locomotives, he mentions
figures that rage from 1/8 th the diameter of the ball, to one third the
diameter of the ball depending on the use it is put to. Hand pumps using
the middle size lift, steam pumps using the smallest, and injectors the
largest! Must be quite a job to make up al those different lift check
valves, and then keep them straight as to which service they will be
used in!
Keith Taylor   Jefferson, Maine
P.S. Over the weekend, had a great time at the Autumn steam meet at Don
Jackson's "East Boothbay Central Supply" here in Maine. I actually ran
one of my steam locomotives, the first that has happened in several
years now!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harry Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of sslivesteam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: Speaking of water pumps . . .


> At 12:20 PM 10/17/04 -0400, you wrote:
> >I need to look through my refernce materials, but for some reason the
> >formula of the ball lift being 1/3rd of the seat diameter comes to
mind,
> >as the optimal lift figure. - Keith
>
>          How about 1/8 to 1/6 ball diameter.   Have a look at
> <http://www.ggls.org/CheckValves/index.html>  That should be
MTYEWTKACVBWATA.
>
>
> Regards,
> Harry Wade
> Nashville  Tennessee
>

 

Reply via email to