On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10:43PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > > > > >>>> Just pass the fd to the client, it's simple and doesn't require us to > >>>> replicate logic to open/close debug files in the children. > >>>> > >>> I didn't realize you could do that. > >>> > >>> > >> I am not sure this approach is portable. > >> I know Solaris and Linux can do it. > >> I am not sure HP-UX can. > >> > > > > We are not *transferring* a socket between process, we are merely not > > closing it on fork/exec. It is standard posix behavior that file > > descriptors are inherited by children afaik. > > > > Simo. > > > > > Yes this way it is standard. I thought you wanted to pass a socket > between processes later after fork. > But here is the question. If you have multiple children writing to the > same fd at the same time how you then sort which one has written what. > Would it be better to have a log per child process instead and have a > pid appended to the name of the log file than all output in one file mixed? > It is usually hard to read and debug when everything is mixed in one file. > > > -- > Thank you, > Dmitri Pal >
Currently I'll use the pid in the starting block of the log messsage. bye, Sumit _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
