Hi Christian:
--- On Thu, 3/26/09, Christian Tismer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not to be misunderstood, I really support it and find it
> useful. But is there anything about pickling that cannot be
> replaced by something else? I think, while being tedious, in principle >it
> is always possible to emulate this.
Okay pickling is not necessary but I think it makes certain problems much
easier. Moreover I think Stackless is richer, not poorer for having it. I think
the issue is to develop the idioms for using pickling properly.
> IOW, for a Stackless without pickling, it would be possible >to implement it
> in plain Python, given that some introspection is >available.
>
> Please spend a couple of thoughts about it,
> and tell me if I'm wrong or right?
Offhand, some form of code injection comes to mind. However I think that is
messy. Let me think more about this.
Cheers,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
