On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Andrew Francis <[email protected]> > From: Richard Tew <[email protected]> >>No-one has ever volunteered the time to do documentation for Stackless >>unfortunately. > > I just wrote a document on channel preferences. Only one person commented on > it. I wrote sample code for deadlock detection and a fairly extensive > explanation of the problem. No one commented on that. That is okay, I put > the stuff out there. However I consider all of the aforementioned a volunteer > effort.
Andrew, Clearly I know there is some documentation there, I've written a lot of it. Frankly, I am embarrassed to say.. look here's the wiki, there's some stuff in there which covers something, and here's the example code, maybe you can search through all that stuff and find some code that vaguely references something you want to know about, maybe search the mailing list archives as well. It's saying, if you want to use Stackless, you'll most likely have to research the answers you want yourself. And I alluded that Simon would have to do this in my reply. So what can my statement mean given we both know there are bits and pieces of documentation? You may not know that I've written a decent amount of it myself. Perhaps that if someone asks for documentation for Stackless, that the honest answer is that there isn't any and users are left to do the work of researching the bits and pieces. And that the reason there isn't any, is that no-one has ever taken it on themselves to make a proper set. Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
