On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Chris Jacobson<[email protected]> wrote: > I can think of at least one situation when this could occur, involving > Channel Preference of 1 (Sender): > > Channel N is created with preference 1 > Tasklet A and B start > Tasklet A runs, receives on N, and blocks > Tasklet B sees N has balance -1, so sends to N. Due to Preference, B will > not yield, instead A is placed at end of runnables queue. The channel's > balance is now 0. > Tasklet B continues running, sees N has a balance of 0, so does not send. > Repeat ad infinitum. Tasklet B never explicitly schedules or gets blocked > otherwise, and so A never wakes up.
Reproduction case? Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
