Progress - it's now building, but I do see regular python test fails (compared to stock 2.7.rc2) on:
test_email test_functools test_pep352 test_pickletools test_sax test_sys test_tk test_ttk_guionly I'm looking into them. In particular so far: test_pep352 fails because a text file in the test is missing a reference to TaskletExit. Easy to fix, though it also raises an issue about whether TaskletExit should really be derived from SystemExit or the BaseException class. test_functools is related the test_pickletools fail which might have something to do with the other pickling problem that Kristjan mentioned. K- Does test_pickletools succeed for you? The problem seems to have to do with some wrapping of a function by stackless... test_email and text_sax have to do with line endings (\n vs \r\n) -- which is odd and troublesome... and I'm looking more... test_sys has to do with the slot wrapper object size (for int.__add__) being 44 bytes instead of 40. (This might be correct for stackless -- it appears this test is commented out in release26_maint) and I haven't check the tk stuff yet at all... On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Jeff Senn wrote: > Good so far, but there were a few nits that needed manual cleanup... I'm > doing that now... > > and one (trivial) compile problem (in Objects/descrobject.c) that probably > isn't present on windows... > > On Jun 24, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote: > >> Ok, I have re-applied what configuration information I could find under >> /trunk >> /trunk/mac >> /trunk/pcbuild >> >> I did this by taking the most recent /python/trunk version of these files >> and reapplying the changes we had previously had for stackless. >> >> configure and configure.in are alien to me, maybe I did it wrong? >> >> K >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- >>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Senn >>> Sent: 24. júní 2010 00:41 >>> To: The Stackless Python Mailing List >>> Subject: Re: [Stackless] stackess for 2.7 >>> >>> Hm.. must have missed that message.... >>> >>> Though I just checked out the stackless/trunk and the first problem I >>> encountered >>> is the configure stuff is regular python (not stackless)... >>> >>> Kristjan can you comment about the current state of trunk? (i.e. do I >>> just >>> need to fix the configure stuff?) I'm willing to help out... >>> >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Richard Tew wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Jeff Senn <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Now that Python 2.7 is imminent... is there a plan to merge in for >>> Stackless 2.7? >>>> >>>> In due course. >>>> >>>> To quote an email Kristjan sent: >>>> """ >>>> I have updated stackless/trunk to be in line with revision 81971 of >>>> python/trunk. This was quite a bit of work, since a lot has changed >>>> in python/trunk, including whitespace. >>>> >>>> It all workse now, (stackless tests, that is) except for one thing: >>>> >>>> A test in test_pickle fails, because it fails to correctly pickle a >>> cell object >>>> >>>> >>>> It ends up trying to pickle the __main__.TestConcretePickledTasklets >>>> class, not by global name but by picling its contents. It eventually >>>> fails when it is pickling a module dictionary that contains a file >>>> object. This module dictionary is for some reason not found in the >>>> module dictionary id mapping in pricklepit.c. >>>> >>>> Anyway, that is probably not the reason and we need to find out why >>>> the class is being pickled, and if everything is happening as >>>> expected. >>>> """ >>>> >>>> If the release is to be made in a timely fashion, this needs to be >>>> fixed first (in addition to any other problems arising from the >>>> merge). I currently have other obligations, so it is unlikely I will >>>> be looking into it any time soon. So it either depends on Christian, >>>> Kristjan or someone else stepping forward and digging into it for >>> now. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Richard. >>>> >>>> Richard. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Stackless mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Stackless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stackless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
