Hi Richard:
________________________________
From: Richard Tew <[email protected]>
To: Andrew Francis <[email protected]>; The Stackless Python Mailing List
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Stackless] A Timer Method
AF> Given the ubiquity of timing, why isn't timing is a built in feature? For
RT>Because it is too high level. To me the existing set of features are
RT>a nice clean set which sit together at a low level.
Fair enough. I understand Stackless' minimalist approach. I have a different
philosophy concerning where stuff like tasklet synchronisation should be
located.
>You should install "stacklesslib". It provides the next highest level
>up set of functionality which people can base an application on,
>including support for sleeping. It was used at CCP when last I was
>there for DUST, and I use it also for my personal projects now. In
>fact, what I tend to do lately is to have stacklesslib monkey patch in
>place all of its functionality, and just write normal Python code and
>have stackless magic added in the background.
>pip install stacklesslib
>Should do the trick. It comes with stacklesssocket bundled.
Okay, let me install stacklesslib and play with it. Thanks for the advice
Cheers,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
