I took a skim through this morning before I left the house, and I think it generally looked fine.
Channels already work across threads, is there a reason they don't work as is in a suitable manner? If not, perhaps we ought to consider making them do so in Stackless itself? I'll take a closer look at the code later on when I have a more usable device than an iPad at my hands. Just as well gmail saves drafts as safari just crashed again.. Once you're happy with it, if you want to commit a version to the Stackless examples project let me know. Cheers, Richard. On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey there, > > I have started playing with the multiprocessing package together with stackless. > I came up with this POC implementation of the channels, working across processes. > > If any of you stackless gurus could take a quick look there: > > http://www.internike.com/mp_stackless.html > > and let me know if you see any serious flaw with the basic concept, before I get too excited about it, > I'd be infinitely grateful ;-) > > > Nike > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
