Hi,
Am 08.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Richard Tew:
Is there any value in passing in the tasklet the exception happened
in, as the first argument of the error handler?
I think so.
If every thread has a scheduler, should the error handler be stored in
the thread context?
Nice to have, but not strictly necessary, if you pass in the tasklet.
One could write a "dispatching error handler" that uses
tasklet.thread_id to delegate to a thread specific handler.
I have a use case with several threads that run completely independent
from each other. Here I could use a per thread error handler.
Cheers
Anselm
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
Done, check it out in the repo.
This is currently indirectly possible, by setting stackless.tasklettype
(IIRC) wehre you can put a tasklet subclass that overrides the __new__ etc.
But the problem with both approaches is that an exception delivered before
the tasklet has had the chance to run for the first time won't be handled by
this. Hence my suggestion to set a global handler. Having a module level
handler is fine, IMO. Adding such a beast is also simple to do. Perhaps
I'll make the experiment.
Sounds fine to me, also.
Cheers,
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
--
Dipl. Phys. Anselm Kruis science + computing ag
Senior Solution Architect Ingolstädter Str. 22
email [email protected] 80807 München, Germany
phone +49 89 356386 874 fax 737 www.science-computing.de
--
Vorstandsvorsitzender/Chairman of the board of management:
Gerd-Lothar Leonhart
Vorstand/Board of Management:
Dr. Bernd Finkbeiner, Michael Heinrichs,
Dr. Arno Steitz, Dr. Ingrid Zech
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/
Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
Philippe Miltin
Sitz/Registered Office: Tuebingen
Registergericht/Registration Court: Stuttgart
Registernummer/Commercial Register No.: HRB 382196
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
