Am 05.09.2013 08:27, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
In short: Architectural niceness, and hopefully simpler platform support since
platform support is part of the separate, smaller, and easily testable, tealet
module.
Well that is a good reason to change 3.x, but is it a valid reason to
change 2.7? Only if we plan to add new architectures or if the change
greatly reduces the maintenance effort.
In addition, hopefully faster switching with less memory use.
For the latter case, I really should gather some metrics, of course :)
Increased performance justifies the case, especially if you have a large
scale installation.
Kristján, how risky is the change? Currently 2.7-slp is a very reliable
piece of software used on many production sites. Every new bug is really
expensive.
Cheers
Anselm
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Anselm Kruis
Sent: 4. september 2013 14:39
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Stackless] stackless-tealet
What are the key benefits we get from tealet? I wonder, if there is any
compelling reason to change the 2.7 implementation.
--
Dipl. Phys. Anselm Kruis science + computing ag
Senior Solution Architect Ingolstädter Str. 22
email [email protected] 80807 München, Germany
phone +49 89 356386 874 fax 737 www.science-computing.de
--
Vorstandsvorsitzender/Chairman of the board of management:
Gerd-Lothar Leonhart
Vorstand/Board of Management:
Dr. Bernd Finkbeiner, Michael Heinrichs,
Dr. Arno Steitz, Dr. Ingrid Zech
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/
Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
Philippe Miltin
Sitz/Registered Office: Tuebingen
Registergericht/Registration Court: Stuttgart
Registernummer/Commercial Register No.: HRB 382196
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
