No, let me be clear. I do not have an opinion about the source control. I am suggesting that Stackless-related discussion stay on this mailing list. It is a general topic that covers 2.x and 3.x and does not relate to enhancing the 2.x line.
And that Python 2.x development go on another mailing list. Cheers, Richard. On 10/30/13, Kristján Valur Jónsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, if we just branch stackless 2.7 into 2.8 it is automatically added to > that... It would make sense to keep it in the same repo, or a clone, for > easy integration. > I don't know if there is a reason to host a separate clone repository, the > existence of /stackless at python.org is merely to keep the stackless > branches out of the > way of cpython devs. > K > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Tew >> Sent: 30. október 2013 05:42 >> To: The Stackless Python Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [Stackless] Fwd: [Stackless-checkins] stackless (2.7-slp): >> add a >> filter function to zipfile.PyZipFile. >> >> Perhaps there should be a separate mailing list for this Stackless Python >> 2.8 >> when it starts? I imagine we could also have it hosted on python.org if >> we >> wanted. >> >> The reason I suggest it is that it seems like the subjects of Stackless >> functionality and general Python support and development are mutually >> exclusive, and it will therefore be for the best. >> >> Cheers, >> Richard. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stackless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
