On 25.11.13 17:20, Anselm Kruis wrote:
Hi,
Hi Anselm, quick question before thinking any further:
...
Those extensions, once installed via "stackless" are then also available
via "python".
Example: pywin32 would get installed uniquely by "stackless -m pip
pywin32". It would
work as well with "python" in the same installation.
Are you sure? Granted for pure python packages, but surely not for
compiled extensions. They depend on the python-DLL and the the name of
the DLL would be different for Stackless 2.8 and CPython 2.7.
Hum, this is important.
I had tested the same PySide egg, built for "python 2.7 VS 2010" and could
install the egg in a "stackless VS 2010" as well. This made me believe
I could use the same extension for both interpreter
versions.
But I forgot that in a combined approach the .DLL names must be different.
If there is no simple way out, then I must retract this idea.
That changes a lot, very important that you noticed that.
I would have loved such a hybrid thing, but if you don't see a chance,
then I'm sadly retracting. ?
thanks a lot - Chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
