> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian Tismer > Sent: 28. nóvember 2013 22:27 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Stackless] Fwd: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill > fated initiatives > > Hi friends, > > I almost fell in the trap to react to this by saying """hey, I could have > reacted > exactly as anatoly did""". > > Guido's explainment is the first thing that was understandable to me. > > The whole rest, hard to follow links to long chains of other links to related > documents, the unfriendly, burocratic treatment in the issue-tracker, the > closing of issue as a slap in the face - this made me feel like it was myself: > > It appears as he wanted to improve the PEP process and submit a patch to > the peps by a pull request that was not the way peps work. > My goodness, he was asked to discuss this first on python-ideas! > I think I know why I never submit peps. > > I would like to know your opinion befor I start another fight for nothing. > I have the impression that people no longer realize how boring and > distracting it is to even read all the stuff. > > And I think the intent to avoid a discussion in the large on Python-dev was a > good thing that should be honored.
Perhaps next PyCon is a good place to discuss these things. Maybe we should get in tough with someone who is likely to sympathise with these views and set up some sort of a forum, a BOF or whatever they are called, to bring these concerns that many of us are surely having. Who's going to PyCon this year? K _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
