I enabled the wiki too btw. Where are people going to start listing all the desired backports? Perhaps a wiki page?
Cheers, Richard. On 11/29/13, Kristján Valur Jónsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, I think that if we are moving to Bitbucket, even if it is only as an > experiment, we should give their defect tracking a go. > Now, what about the wiki? Bitbucket has a wiki too, I'd suggest it as a > place to discuss things, such as what features to backport, etc.... > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Tew >> Sent: 28. nóvember 2013 06:45 >> To: The Stackless Python Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless 2.8 layout (or stackless python 404) >> >> >> Is there anyone who feels strongly that we should keep using the >> trac-based >> issue system on stackless.com? >> >> What were you thinking I should do with pydica, Christian? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
