Maybe there's a lesson to be learned that you just can't make divergent jumps like this, and expect the community to follow. But then again, the community will have no choice but to eventually follow given 2.x is closed.
Personally, I'm over it. It's all in the doing now, we release Stackless 2.8 because that's what we're interested in. Cheers, Richard. On 12/31/13, Kristján Valur Jónsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex Gaynor just blogged about the failed state of 3.x and the need to give > in and produce a better 2.x > > > > http://alexgaynor.net/2013/dec/30/about-python-3/ > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
