You mean like: Python 3.2.5 Stackless 3.2.
It looks confusing. Better just to ditch the number I think. On 3/5/14, Kristján Valur Jónsson <[email protected]> wrote: > why not just go with 3.2? Does anyone use this number at all anyway? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Tew >> Sent: 3. mars 2014 02:20 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Stackless] stackless_version.h >> >> 3.1b3 060516 is kind of a magic number, maybe we could do away with it? >> I >> was going to bump it to 3.2, but decided it would be a little confusing. >> >> Objections? >> >> Python 2.7.6r2 Stackless 3.1b3 060516 (default, Mar 3 2014, 15:11:44) >> [MSC >> v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or >> "license" >> for more information. >> >> Cheers, >> Richard. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stackless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
