[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: antonp
Date: Tue May 2 01:37:49 2006
New Revision: 398856
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398856&view=rev
[...]
+// used to exercise
+// find (const value_type*, size_type, size_type)
+static const TestCase ptr_size_size_test_cases [] = {
+
+#undef TEST
+#define TEST(str, arg, off, size, res, bthrow) \
+ { __LINE__, off, size, -1, -1, -1, str, sizeof str - 1, arg, \
+ sizeof arg - 1, 0, 0, res, bthrow }
+
+ // +--------------------------------------- controlled sequence
+ // | +-------------------------- sequence to be found
+ // | | +---------- find() off argument
+ // | | | +------ find() n argument
+ // | | | | +-- expected result
+ // | | | | | exception info
+ // | | | | | | 0 - no exception
+ // | | | | | | 1 - length_error
+ // | | | | | |
+ // | | | | | +----+
+ // V V V V V V
[...]
+ TEST ("", "cba", 0, -1, 0, 1),
+ TEST ("abcdefghij", "cba", 0, -1, 0, 1),
+ TEST (LSTR, "xxx", 0, -1, 0, 1),
+ TEST ("abcdefghij", LSTR, 0, -1, 0, 1),
I'm not certain this is correct. Can you explain what makes you
think the find function should throw length_error in these cases
(or in any case for that matter)?
Thanks
Martin
