Liviu Nicoara wrote:
FWIW, option 3 makes more sense to me.
It could be enhanced though in the light of Martin's reply to Mark: some
tests do not cleanly apply to a section. In which case option 3 can be
enhanced to place such tests in the regress dir w/o a section number.
I would agree with the suggested enhancement. I recall seeing the reply
in question, and I think the enhancement was batting around in the back
of my mind prior to proposing the option, but I neglected to articulate it.
--Andrew Black
Liviu
Andrew Black wrote:
If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is for
Option 2. The reason for this vote is because it allows us to more
easily determine what regression tests need to be run for a particular
change.
If we don't constrain ourselves to the proposed options, I wish to put
forward an additional option.
Option 3:
Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, using the following
naming convention:
tests/regress/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
This option would allow us to quickly locate all regression tests, and
identify which section each regression test applies to without
consulting Jira.
--Andrew Black
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm not hearing any yay's or nay's on the proposed convention
so how about a vote to practice our consensus building skills?
Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
Option 1:
Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, naming each as
follows:
tests/regress/stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
Option 2:
Mix regression tests in with the rest based on the clause
in the standard and name each according to the following
formula:
tests/<section>/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
Martin
