[image: GeorgeSoros.com Newsletter]

Dear Friends and Colleagues,



George Soros writes about exchange rate conflicts in today's FT. I've
included the text below.



Mr. Soros also discusses his views with FT commentator Martin Wolf in
this *View
from the Top* interview.



http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f4dd9122-d22a-11df-8fbe-00144feabdc0.html
<http://www.georgesoros.com/page/m/1b9e2745/1552ce19/3eb002f3/71a2497d/2568973123/VEsH/>



All best,



Michael Vachon



*China** must fix the global currency crisis*

*George** Soros***

*Financial Times October 8, 2010*

I share the growing concern about the misalignment of currencies. Brazil's
finance minister speaks of a latent currency
war<http://www.georgesoros.com/page/m/1b9e2745/1552ce19/3eb002f3/71a2497e/2568973123/VEsE/>,
and he is not far off the mark. It is in the currency markets where
different economic policies and different economic and political systems
interact and clash.

The prevailing exchange rate system is lopsided. China has essentially
pegged its currency to the dollar while most other currencies fluctuate more
or less freely. China has a two-tier system in which the capital account is
strictly controlled; most other currencies don't distinguish between current
and capital accounts. This makes the Chinese currency chronically
undervalued and assures China of a persistent large trade surplus.

Most importantly, this arrangement allows the Chinese government to skim off
a significant slice from the value of Chinese exports without interfering
with the incentives that make people work so hard and make their labor so
productive. It has the same effect as taxation but it works much better.

This has been the secret of China's success. It gives China the upper hand
in its dealings with other countries because the government has discretion
over the use of the surplus. And it protected China from the financial
crisis, which shook the developed world to its core. For China the crisis
was an extraneous event that was experienced mainly as a temporary decline
in exports.

It is no exaggeration to say that since the financial crisis, China has been
in the driver's seat. Its currency moves have had a decisive influence on
exchange rates. Earlier this year when the euro got into
trouble<http://www.georgesoros.com/page/m/1b9e2745/1552ce19/3eb002f3/71a2497f/2568973123/VEsF/>,
China adopted a wait-and-see policy. Its absence as a buyer contributed to
the euro's decline. When the euro hit 120 against the dollar China stepped
in to preserve the euro as an international currency. Chinese buying
reversed the euro's decline.

More recently, when Congressional legislation against Chinese currency
manipulation<http://www.georgesoros.com/page/m/1b9e2745/1552ce19/3eb002f3/71a24978/2568973123/VEsC/>emerged
as a real threat, China allowed its currency to appreciate against
the dollar by a couple of percentage points. Yet the rise in the euro, yen
and other currencies compensated for the fall in the dollar, preserving
China's advantage.

China's dominant position is now endangered by both external and internal
factors. The impending global slowdown has intensified protectionist
pressures. Countries such as Japan, Korea and Brazil are intervening
unilaterally in currency markets.

If they started imitating China by imposing restrictions on capital
transfers, China would lose some of its current advantages. Moreover, global
currency markets would be disrupted and the global economy would
deteriorate.

Internally, consumption as a percentage of GDP has fallen from an already
low 46 per cent in 2000 to 35.6 per cent in 2009, as China expert Michael
Pettis has shown. Additional investments in capital goods offer very low
returns. From now on, consumption must grow much faster than GDP.

Thus both internal and external considerations cry out for allowing the
renminbi to appreciate. But currency adjustments must be part of an
internationally coordinated plan to reduce global imbalances.

The imbalances in the US are the mirror image of China. China is threatened
by inflation, the US by deflation. At nearly 70 per cent of GDP, consumption
in the US is too high. The US needs fiscal stimulus enhancing
competitiveness rather than quantitative easing that puts upward pressure on
all currencies other than the renminbi.

The US also needs the renminbi to rise in order to reduce the trade deficit
and alleviate the burden of accumulated debt. China, in turn, could accept a
higher renminbi and a lower overall growth rate as long as the share of
consumption is rising and the improvement in living standards continues.

The public in China would be satisfied, only exporters would suffer and the
currency surplus accruing to the Chinese government would diminish. A large
rise would be disastrous, as Premier Wen
says<http://www.georgesoros.com/page/m/1b9e2745/1552ce19/3eb002f3/71a24979/2568973123/VEsD/>,
but 10 percent a year should be tolerable.

Since the Chinese government is the direct beneficiary of the currency
surplus, it would need to have remarkable foresight to accept this
diminution in its power and recognize the advantages of coordinating its
economic policies with the rest of the world. It needs to recognize that
China cannot continue rising without paying more attention to the interests
of its trading partners.

Only China is in a position to initiate a process of international
cooperation because it can offer the enticement of renminbi appreciation.
China has already developed an elaborate mechanism for consensus building at
home. Now it must go a step further and engage in consensus building
internationally. This would be rewarded by the rest of the world accepting
the rise of China.

Whether it realises it or not, China has emerged as a leader of the world.
If it fails to live up to the responsibilities of leadership, the global
currency system is liable to break down and take the global economy with it.
Either way, the Chinese trade surplus is bound to shrink but it would be
much better for China if that happened as a result of rising living
standards rather than a global economic decline.

The chances of a positive outcome are not good, yet we must strive for it
because in the absence of international cooperation the world is heading for
a period of great turbulence and disruptions.

*The writer is chairman of Soros Fund Management LLC*

***Please do not reply to this message. This email was generated
automatically and responses are not monitored.
 [image: George Soros]





-- 
CA.RAJESH DHIRAJLAL DESAI
"Print this mail only if absolutely necessary. Save Paper. Save Trees."

-- 
For Anything related with Stock market be Online at
http://www.niftyviews.com/ 

Get  free updates on your mobile phone. Sms "Join TSR " and send to 09223492234

 FOR TRIAL STOCK/NIFTY/OPTION CALLS


You received this message because you are subscribed to Google Group  
"STOCKRESEARCHER" group.
To post to this group, send an email to STOCKRESEARCHER@googlegroups.com

To unsubscribe email
stockresearcher-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

for more info visit
http://groups.google.com/group/STOCKRESEARCHER?hl=en-GB
.
This is Not a Spam Mail.
Disclaimer :-
"The opinions expressed by the members on this board are based on
their individual experience and perceptions and to share information
with other members with the best of intentions to help fellow members
in investment decisions as equity investment is a risky venture."

Reply via email to