Wong Kok Wai wrote: > I'm definitely interested but one question: why not use java.util.ResourceBundle as >the > base class? It helps as existing ListResourceBundle and PropertyResourceBundle can >still be > used. > Among other things, ResourceBundle and PropertyResourceBundle are not Serializable. This causes problems on several application servers that like their servlet context attributes, and not just session attributes, to be Serializable. Craig
- i18n and Resources Schachter, Michael
- Re: i18n and Resources Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: i18n and Resources Wong Kok Wai
- RE: i18n and Resources Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: i18n and Resources Schachter, Michael
- RE: i18n and Resources Jason van Zyl
- Re: i18n and Resources Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: i18n and Resources Schachter, Michael
- RE: i18n and Resources Jason van Zyl
- Re: i18n and Resources Jason van Zyl
- Re: i18n and Resources Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: i18n and Resources Jason van Zyl