On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:01:35 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: > Actually, now that I read the generated HTML, I can see how this > isn't actually a conflict -- the roles.xml blurb isn't actually > saying that committers get to cast binding votes... I'm not coming > up with better verbiage, but one clarification would be to add some > text later in the document under the PMC section specifically > mentioning voting. > > Not a huge deal really, but clarity is a good thing.
Agreed. The point is that only the PMC Members have binding votes, and we should be sure the posted text relects that. I think in our case, like HTTPD, any active Committers will end up as PMC Members anyway. But, given our experience, I think the now-conventional two-step process will help reduce the number of inactive PMC Members. It's not been uncommon for a new Struts Committer to fall away after a few months. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]