For the Javascript, I think that Struts should use the following syntax for all javascript rendering:
<script type="text/javascript"> <!-- //--> </script> To my knowledge, this is XHTML* compliant and works in older browsers. -----Original Message----- From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken. > I'm thinking about adding a boolean attribute to the > javascript tag called xhtmlStrict. If set to true, > it would use a CDATA section; if false it wouldn't. > The default would be false to allow maximum useability > while still allowing you to conform to xhtml. > > Thoughts on the attribute name/idea in general are welcome. > > David > Well, if the only behavioral difference caused by the xhtmlStrict attribute is to change the way the <javascript> section is displayed, I would change the name to "javascriptCdata" or something similar. The name xhtmlStrict indicates to me that there will be broader changes made to the generated XHTML than just wrapping the script in CDATA. Honestly, I'm wondering if there shouldn't be a <html:script> tag for cases like this, which generates your <script> tags. I don't know what (if anything) that might break. I imagine that this might cause problems with the Validator, but I'm not entirely sure. -= J -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
