It seems to me that this is logically equivalent to using <jsp:include> with
<jsp:param> to specify the attribute values. In other words, this:

<mytags:foo attr1="bar" attr2="baz"/>

would be logically equivalent to this:

<jsp:include page="mytags/foo.jsp">
    <jsp:param name="attr1" value="bar"/>
    <jsp:param name="attr2" value="baz"/>
</jsp:include>

Is this correct, or is there more to it than that?

I guess one thing you would gain from using a tag versus an include is
better performance, but the idea does seem a little odd to me.

--
Martin Cooper


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: JSP translated to Tags???


> I see two main benefits to something "like" this.  One is that it can be
> done by page authors, wihtout having to ask the developer.  If a page
> author has some fragment, it may even be just plain template!, it can
> encapsulate and reuse it.
>
> The other benefit is that is is actually quite hard to reuse tag
> handlers from Java.  The instantiation protocol is quite complex and
> easy to get wrong.  There is a reason for it but...
>
> The details of JST may or not be the best, but I like the concept, and
> the vendors and developers I've talked to like it too.  Other opinions?
>
> - eduard/o
>
> "Gogineni, Pratima" wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of JRUN - I was playing with their latest version 3.1 and they
have
> > a very strange concept/tool ..
> >
> > You can write jsp pages and name them with a *.jst extension and they
get
> > translated to a custom tag instead of to a servlet. I thought it was not
a
> > good idea - jsp to create tags to use in jsp? and i guess you lose quite
a
> > bit of control on how it is translated etc. and I dont see why writing
the
> > code  as  scriptlets in the jsp page is better than writing the tag
handler
> > classes your self?
> >
> > Does any one see any merits in this approach?
> >
> > pratima
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gogineni, Pratima
> > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 9:24 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: more strange JRUN behavior
> >
> > sadly - I see this in 3.0 as well as 3.1 which was very recently
released. I
> > havent tested the basic authentication as yet. I thought I would have
more
> > control using the form based authentication. I need to evaluate and see
if
> > the basic authentication works fine - else I should probably go with
custom
> > authentication ....
> >
> > I went through their forums too and found messages about the form based
> > authentication.
> >
> > Pratima
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: George Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:28 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: more strange JRUN behavior
> >
> > I, too, have observed this intermittent quirkiness in its authentication
> > behavior.
> >
> > After reading all of their forum posts, the consensus is to use Basic
> > authentication. I concur that it has been the most stable for container
> > authentication in J-Run. I would shy away from Form-based authentication
> > until Macromedia has stabilized it in the next release (to some extent
IIRC,
> > even they acknowledge its shortcomings.) However, I realize this might
not
> > be an option for you.
> >
> > For us, we've opted to use SiteMinder.
> >
> > george
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gogineni, Pratima" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 8:16 PM
> > Subject: more strange JRUN behavior
> >
> > >
> > > I have  a webapp that I have been testing under both tomcat and JRUN
for
> > > sometime now. About a month ago I decided to go with app server
provided
> > > form based security.
> > > I tested my app on JRUN,Tomcat and Resin and it worked fine.
> > >
> > > Since then I had been working only on tomcat - now when I tested with
JRUN
> > > the login screen comes up, I enter the name and password and the
screen
> > just
> > > hangs and the progress bar tells me "opening page j_security-check"  -
now
> > > to check if it was the application that was causing the problem. I
created
> > a
> > > dummy page that does nothing as the welcome page and I CAN login.
> > >
> > > So something in my application is causing JRUN to hang at the security
> > check
> > > - doesnt make too much sense to me. Another thing is that I disabled
the
> > > authentication totally and the application works fine on JRUN.
> > >
> > > Now the question is - has anyone had similar problems with JRUN or
have an
> > > idea why something like this should occur? Surely my app should not
> > > interfere with the appserver authentication - it should atleast
> > authenticate
> > > me and then show an error page. Also works fine in tomcat.... No error
> > > messages in the log files... My init servlets (both Action servlet and
my
> > > own custom servlet) seem to be starting up fine.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have good/bad experiences with JRUN? I have had extremely
> > flaky
> > > behavior from JRUN.
> > > Things seem to work great on Tomcat and Resin.
> > >
> > > pratima


Reply via email to