Oh, duh.  Good point.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> I'm jumping in late on this thread, but why bother using 
> Struts-EL at all under
> JSP 2.0? The original (RT) tags should be magically EL-aware 
> as long as the app
> uses a Servlet 2.4 format web.xml, right?
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> <web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee";
>          xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>          
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd";
>          version="2.4">
>   ...
> </web-app>
> 
> Quoting "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Arne Brutschy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > 
> > > Thursday, October 30, 2003, 3:53:39 PM, you wrote:
> > > RB> Is ${pageContext.request.servletPath} returning anything?
> > > Yes, it is returning the right path.
> > > 
> > > RB>  Try something like
> > > RB> <html:hidden property="requestedPage"><c:out
> > > RB> value="${pageContext.request.servletPath}"/></html:hidden>
> > > I already tried this, it does not work. Basically, it 
> should be the
> > > same as
> > > 
> > >   <html:hidden property="requestedPage">
> > >     ${pageContext.request.servletPath}
> > >   </html:hidden>
> > > or
> > >   <html:hidden property="requestedPage" 
> > > value="${pageContext.request.servletPath}"/>
> > > 
> > > which are both not working. Is this some stutsbug? Why is the
> > > html:hidden tag marked in the tld file with a rtexpressions=false?
> > 
> > OH.  Sigh.  I had originally set all the attributes on the 
> EL tags to
> > have that set to "false", because in JSP 1.2 that refers to 
> whether it
> > will use scriptlet expressions or not, and I wanted to 
> discourage the
> > use of those.  I had recently decided to change those back 
> to "true" out
> > of a sudden attack of pragmatism, but now I see that this 
> (the "false"
> > setting) is causing a more serious problem.  In JSP 2.0, 
> the meaning of
> > this flag is slightly different (I'm assuming) in that it appears a
> > setting of "false" means it won't evaluate EL expressions.
> > 
> > I'll try to get to fixing these tonight and getting it into 
> the nightly
> > build, at least.
> 
> -- 
> Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> D.O.Tech       <http://www.dotech.com/>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to