On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:29:38PM +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote: > Vitaly Mayatskikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > At Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:21:37 +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > > >> I am currently rewriting run-program to not do that anymore. I hope this > >> fixes the last long standing issue with SBCL as stumpwm host. > > > > Are you going just to drop wait3 or to use other tracing facility > > (like ptrace)? > > The idea is to make the whole thing race-free with respect to > signals. wait3/waitpid has to stay, since otherwise you raise an army of > zombie processes. :)
StumpWM -- Raising an army. A zombie army. <3 _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
