On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push > will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? > > Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment > supporting long-term maintenance of a server hosting projects (one of > the two mentioned so far in this thread, or a dedicated > project-hosting service elsewhere), I would focus on creating good > mirrors, rather than on picking any particular single host. There is > currently still risk of losing people's work.
While you wait for a best case scenario.... We will continue to move forward one step at a time. david > SJ > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luke Faraone <l...@faraone.cc> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I like that part. Are there criteria for removing someone's project >>> if it's deemed inappropriate? >> >> Not yet, but I assume if someone thinks that somebody else's use of SL >> infrastrucutre is not under the project scope we'll discuss it on the >> sugar-devel or IAEP mailing list. >> >> -- >> Luke Faraone >> http://luke.faraone.cc >> > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel