Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas >> <sebast...@when.com> wrote: >>> Short Term Action Items: >>> * We create a SoaS mailing list. >>> * We establish the SoaS development team. >> >> if you split off sugar-dev, to reach the involved people you either >> have to crosspost all the time, or get everyone sub'd to both.
I'm with Jonas on this one. > That depends on your definition of "everyone". > > Possibly everyone directly involved in developing Sugar is also actively > involved in developing SoaS. > > But not everyone interested in closely _following_ the development of > Sugar (and thus in subscribing to the mailinglist) is also interested in > closely following the development of SoaS. Agreed. I think such a list should be for the *development* of SoaS. That's something that concerns Sugar, too, but not my all means. If we discuss technical changes to SoaS with regard to deployments or whatsoever, sugar-devel might not be the best place. Some may suggest to take that then to IAEP, but if it's about the technical side of things, I think it should go to a different list. > It might be that I am the only one not part of your "everyone". But I > doubt it. I imagine more people that love the concept of SoaS but have > their hands full already with e.g. other distributions - making Sugar > interesting to follow closely but SoaS too much sidetracking. Right. And I don't think that sugar-devel needs to get noisier than it is now - I'm strongly suggesting to create a soas mailing list. > Kind regards, and all the best with the development of SoaS, > > - Jonas Thanks! :) --Sebastian _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel