On 11/24/2009 02:12 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as a follow up on an older thread: >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-October/019939.html >> - we want to get the versioning sorted in 0.88 for real. So far we came >> up with these three options: >> >> a) The release cycle dependent one: Activities name their activity after >> the Sugar version they are developed against. If it was released during >> the 0.88 cycle and developed against 0.88, then it would be 0.88.x. > > Most of activities are compatible with several release cycles, so using > SP in activity versions adds only confusing
Yup, agreed. Thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel