On 08/29/2013 06:01 AM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:35 AM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
On 08/28/2013 11:03 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I agree in the need of testing.
Testing is more difficult this cycle because:
* We have less developers working.
* We don't have the images we usually used to test on our main hardware platform (XO*) yet.
I don't know if any test is done now on Fedora 20 Sugar spin,
Soas F20 Alpha TC1 live x86_64 starts as a gnome desktop with only e-toys and a utility group of apps. There is no sugar. yum install @sugar-desktop does not install sugar. This has been the case for a while in nightly composes also.

TC2 is just out and I am looking at it.

Same for f20 Alpha TC2:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Soas-Alpha-TC2-x86_64.png

I just did "yum install lightdm" in {alt} {f2} root console of installed F20_Alpha_TC-2-Soas and sugar starts after restart:

(I remembered we used lightdm in f19 Soas)

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:F20_Alpha_TC-2-SoaS_with_lightdm_.png

Tom Gilliard

Tom Gilliard
but according to Peter Robinson mail, not too much communication from that part. From my part, I am building rpms for Australia, to use sugar 0.100 on a F18 image. We will do testing on that, but not in the web part, at least not now, due to missing dependencies.

Gonzalo


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com <mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 28 August 2013 19:33, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com
    <mailto:walter.ben...@gmail.com>> wrote:


        To me the issue is that we have no sense of the urgency of
        the 250
        bugs that have not been triaged. Most of the bugs that have been
        triaged are not urgent and should not hold up the release.
        (They can
        be tagged for 102 with little consequence.) But the great
        unknown is
        what scares me.


    There are those and there are the N bugs which has not been
    discovered because people are not testing... We can block
    rescheduling on completing the triage but can we block on
    someone doing the testing? This is totally a subjective feeling
    but my impression is that the worst bugs are unreported.

    I was hoping to go towards continuous development gradually
    after 0.100 but now I sort of feel forced into it because there
    are too many unknowns to put down a schedule.

    _______________________________________________
    Sugar-devel mailing list
    Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
    <mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org>
    http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel



_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to