On Sunday, 12 January 2014, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Gilliard > <satelli...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting: > > Meeting ended Mon Jan 6 17:05:52 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot > at > > http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . > > > > Minutes: > > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.html > > Minutes (text): > > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.txt > > Log: > > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.log.html > > > > Summary: > > > > Fedora is in the process of setting up a split into 3 distros: ( > > fedora.next) > > #fedora-base > > #fedora-server > > #fedora-workstation > > pushing to a gnome3 (workstation for administrators) > > > > There is a push to drop the DVD and only do lives. > > I am worried that the soas spin and sugar-desktop may get lost in the > > shuffle. > > We need to participate on #fedora-qa and lobby for our fedora future. > > While we should actually be actively participating in Fedora QA anyway > because we derive a lot of value from the work Fedora QA does the > point you make is completely incorrect and invalid. There is no threat > to sugar from being dropped, in fact the only threat of it being > dropped is the Sugar communities lack of general involvement other > than a few people. > > Thomas please get your facts remotely close to being correct before > posting something that is completely false and misleading. >
>From the little I've seen this seems actually something could favor Sugar rather than hurting. The Fedora rings talk was very interesting https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186323.html -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel