On 5/9/07, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nothing particular no. I'm pretty sure you will get the same issue if > you try to build trunk. >
Ok.. given the time constraints and the fact that you're aiming for embedding and aren't going to use xul widgets, why don't you use one of the 1.8 branches and do a pyxpcom build? As far as I know, the only thing 1.9 (Trunk) gets you in terms of python is python/dom which would be useful if you wanted to use xul widgets and script the UI in python... Even if you wanted to try the xul widgets idea (with the tie in to sugar), I think I remember a patch to build the 1.8 branches with python/dom (I might be wrong).. On 5/9/07, Steve Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Standalone is interesting. Can pyxpcom readily exist outside a Mozilla > build? If so what does that mean? Just the XPCOM framework and no > Mozilla components? yes. you get the components necessary to launch xpcom services and not much else.. > Would it be possible to add XUL widgets and XPCOM services to another > python project via pyXPCOM. more or less treating it as a framework > like wxWidgets? I personally don't know anyone who's used it like this but I guess it's possible in theory (but you still have to build all the necessary components).. For me, xulrunner handles all the magic necessary to bootstrap my applications so I have no idea how you'd approach this... _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@laptop.org http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
