On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:55:32PM +0100, Ivan Krstić wrote: > On Dec 4, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Robert McQueen wrote: > > I really don't think these kind of comments are productive for anyone. > > How not? You just wrote a long e-mail explaining *why* things are > fucked, not in the least disputing my claim that they are, indeed, > fucked.
Because it's hard to distinguish gratuitous/personal attacks from a tough-love "fuck, your shit sucks [let's make it better]" type of email. Usually you get a "screw you for dismissing [specific issues you clearly don't understand], now never hope for help again", response, which I suspect just happened. I would love to see the reponse if someone from sugarlabs were to send an email saying "Bitfrost has a long, colourful history of being fucking ineffective and its implementation has a number of holes so wide you could drive a deployment-full of XOs through it, so I suggest you never say 'what great security you have' until Rainbow reaches the maturity of DCE 20 years ago.". I suspect it'd be massive silence since nobody cared about it.[1] > Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://radian.org Martin 1. Though I doubt anyone from sugarlabs would be so rude.
pgpdM5VlVq3ba.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
