On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:29:15 +0200 Laurent Bercot <ska-supervis...@skarnet.org> wrote:
> In the meantime, if you don't want to get your hands dirty, > you can still use s6-svscan/s6-supervise as a process supervision > system without trying to make it run as an init system, just as you > can use runsvdir/runsv as a process supervision system without using > the runit binary. That is real modularity, that is the main reason > why I believe runit and s6 are better designed than > other-init-software-out-there, and it would be *trivial* to port your > "suckless init on Plop" setup from daemontools(-encore) to runit or > s6, even if you don't use every feature those packages provide. You could be right about that. I just finished doing the same setup, except instead of Suckless->daemontools-encore, I did Felker->s6-svscan. Once I cleaned up all my transposition errors, and modified LittKit to work with S6's command names and s6-svstat's output, it worked like a charm, and it appears to work just like Felker->daemontools-encore. Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt June 2015 featured book: The Key to Everyday Excellence http://www.troubleshooters.com/key
