On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 08:36:41 +0000 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Martin "eto" Misuth: > > > > I personally am not so "hot" about this listening socket passing > > stuffs. > > When you've had to deal with tens if not hundreds of different ways > of saying "listen on this IP address and port", you'll come around to > the idea of having a single tool that does this one job universally. > (-: When you've had to deal with just one gratuitously entangled architecture perported to be the "single way to rule them all", you'll come around to the idea that there are much worse things than tens if not hundreds of ways of doing something, and perhaps it's a matter of documentation and discussion throughout the community rather than a fait accompli by a $14.1 Billion corporation and its proxies. SteveT Steve Litt November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
