Just tested again with 0.74.6: If I disable for example the last rule on WAN interface in the GUI, the error appears. After enabeling the rule again, the error stays....
Scott Ullrich schrieb: > I havent tested a Embedded image (remember its second rate citizen in > pfSense). The PC version works fine. > > Scott > > > On 8/10/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>FYI >> >>This seems to still be an issue on 0.74.6 at least on a wrap board. >>I don't notice the error on a standard update on a PC. >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: 10 August 2005 15:03 >>To: Randy B >>Cc: M. Kohn; discussion@pfsense.com >>Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Security problem while loading rules? >> >>This should not be a problem any longer in the latest version. I >>would suggest upgrading. >> >>Scott >> >> >>On 8/10/05, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>M. Kohn wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I just updated to 0.74.6 and got a problem while loading >>>>the rules: (Don't know if the problem was there before...) >>>> >>>>----- >>>>Aug 10 09:36:07 192.xxx.xxx.xxx php: There were error(s) >>>>loading the rules: [...] syntax error pfctl: Syntax error >>>>in config file: pf rules not loaded - The line in question >>>>reads [175]: pass quick on dc1 proto esp from 212.xxx.xxx.xxx >>>>to keep state label "IPSEC: esp proto" >>>>----- >>>> >>> >>>I had this problem horribly on 0.74.4 too - ended up having to comment >>>out the entire section of /etc/inc/filter.inc that dealt with IPsec >>>before the filters would correctly set up and allow me out of my >>>network. That really sucked. >>> >>>In the GUI, it seems like there's a partial IPsec tunnel defined - the >>>entire line is empty except for 'WAN' in the 'Remote Interface GW'. >>>When I tried to edit it, I just got a new tunnel. Ergh. >>> >>>RB --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
