We already had this feature in earlier releases but dropped it due to not 
working correctly and machines crashing. Maybe things have changed a bit since 
we were running something between alpha and beta of freebsd these days. 
However, it's not considered a good solution even from the developers of CARP. 
I think the carp tutorial at pfsense.com even explains this option still as it 
was not updated after that item had gone. 

Holger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Mortimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:14 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] CARP Load balance
> 
> 
> > On 8/25/06, Robert Mortimer 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > You'll want to reboot after making that change.  This 
> naturally isn't
> > > > supported, but if you understand how carp balancing 
> works, it's still
> > > > configurable.
> > >
> > > This is the case outlined in the Docs
> >
> > Yeah, see, the problem is that most people would (and do) 
> configure it
> > w/out understanding what it does and then complain that 
> they randomly
> > have packet or connection loss.  Most people would and have tried to
> > use it to load balance FIREWALLS, not network connections.  If you
> > have any suggestions on how to reenable this w/out also making the
> > support of it's incorrect usage a nightmare, we're all ears (hint:
> > putting a description next to the checkbox won't cut it ;))
> >
> > --Bill
> 
> Had a further look at the docs. To load balance across 2 
> machines requires
> 2 pairs of carp interfaces each pair skewed to a different 
> box. Further
> pfsense
> hacking will be required to get this going
> 
> From Man page ----------------------
> 
> In order to set up an ARP balanced virtual host, it is 
> necessary to con-
> figure one virtual host for each physical host which would 
> respond to ARP
> requests and thus handle the traffic.  In the following 
> example, two vir-
> tual hosts are configured on two hosts to provide balancing 
> and failover
> for the IP address 192.168.1.10.
> 
> First the carp interfaces on Host A are configured.  The 
> advskew of 100
> on the second virtual host means that its advertisements will 
> be sent out
> slightly less frequently.
> 
>  # ifconfig carp0 create
>  # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.10 \
>     netmask 255.255.255.0
>  # ifconfig carp1 create
>  # ifconfig carp1 vhid 2 advskew 100 pass mekmitasdigoat \
>     192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
> 
> The configuration for host B is identical, except the skew is 
> on virtual
> host 1 rather than virtual host 2.
> 
>  # ifconfig carp0 create
>  # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 advskew 100 pass mekmitasdigoat \
>     192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
>  # ifconfig carp1 create
>  # ifconfig carp1 vhid 2 pass mekmitasdigoat 192.168.1.10 \
>     netmask 255.255.255.0
> 
> Finally, the ARP balancing feature must be enabled on both hosts:
> 
>  # sysctl net.inet.carp.arpbalance=1
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> I will let you know how I get on
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to