William Bulley schrieb: > According to Chris Buechler <cbuech...@gmail.com> on Mon, 01/12/09 at 11:44: > >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:36 AM, William Bulley <w...@umich.edu> wrote: >> >>> Second, I have one question: >>> >>> "How does one set (and save) a default route (as in "route add default >>> 10.0.0.1") >>> from within pfSense?" >>> >> On the WAN. The WAN interface needs to be the one facing the rest of >> your network as it's the only one that can have the default gateway >> (in 1.2.x). Though I think just plugging your gateway IP into the WAN >> page will suffice regardless of whether it really resides on WAN. >> > > Thanks. > > Is this behaviour essential to pfSense? It doesn't seem like it would > be a FreeBSD requirement. Maybe a future enhancement to pfSense may make > multiple interfaces more "interchangeable" or "clone-like". What if my > sis0 interface on my 4801 died (unlikely, to be sure). I would want to > move to use a different (sis1 or sis2) interface. It seems to me all the > (like, ethernet) interfaces should have identical configuration choices. > > I say this as a newbie if only to avoid confusion with the "AccessPoint2" > URL tutorial which made no mention of this feature/fact IIRC. I will try > your WAN suggestion above. If this works, so be it. I think this would > mean that WAN (sis1) would become active (since it is disabled at present). > That is the only unusual side-effect, but not a serious show stopper. > > Thanks again for your help. > > Regards, >
FreeBSD6 had no support for lagg(4). Though I think it may have been MFCed to 6.4. FreeBSD7 has. Pfsense 1.2 was developed with FreeBSD6 in mind. I don't know - maybe pfSense 2.0 will have support for lagg(4)? I don't miss it - I only have one DSL line anyway ;-) Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
