On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Greg Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Razvan Cristian Oprea wrote:
>
> > There are two options here, and SuSE took the third.
> >
> > 1. RedHat chose GNOME (you have the option to choose KDE in RH 6.0, but they
> > only develop GNOME and the integration is GNOME-like).
> > 2. Caldera chose KDE (in 2.2). Period.
> > 3. SuSE chose both of them (in 6.1), without actively supporting either of them
> > (as far as I know). And history teaches us that those who wanted to stay neuter
> > got beaten first. Will SaX and YaST be integrated into a graphical environment
> > SuSE? Why not developing your own system control and configuration applications
> > under one of this two graphical environments, giving it the fingerprint of your
> > own personality?
>
> I would say that the choice of Gnome and KDE provided SuSE is great. I
> think that it is a benefit, not a liability. Systems integrators and end
> users can choose one or the other as a standard. I hope SuSE continues to
> offer choices and 5 full CDs. There are things that I miss with RH which
> is why for my next purchase I am choosing SuSE 6.1 over Caldera and RH.
> I dig Gnome which is a big reason I didn't go with Caldera, and there are
> just so many moe apps with SuSE than with RH. I'll probably play around
> with Cheapbytes versions of Caldera (if there is one) and RH but my
> main money is going to SuSE.
>
> Later, Greg
>
>
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
