As a after thought
 what about added value of their by-products? 

MH wrote:
> 
> Agreed!

motie_d wrote:
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  Arguments  against  US corn and soybean  biofuel  seems
> >  outlandish IF it boosts bushel price due to increased
> >  demand thus lowering US gov't subsidize payments
> >  helping to balance US deficits
> 
> You can take my discussion points as either for or against, depending
> on your perspective. I agree with the use of EXCESS crop production
> being used for energy purposes. I dislike the inefficiencies of it.
> If farmers are going to grow energy crops, I think they should be
> growing Sugar Beets for Ethanol, or several alternative higher-
> yielding Oil Crops instead of Soybeans. I think it is foolish to grow
> Corn with the intention to produce Ethanol from it. If the corn has
> been grown for feed, and has been overproduced, of course it should
> be converted instead of left to rot.
> 
>  Have I thoroughly confused everyone yet?
> 
> Motie
> 
> >
> >  and
> >
> >  I would think the savings might provide synergy for
> >  invested interest in further development of the
> >  next big oil bonanza.
> >
> >  Maybe a gov't.inc revenue restructuring
> >  without further citizen tax dollar giveaways
> >  and perhaps a boost for business/job development.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to