As a after thought what about added value of their by-products? MH wrote: > > Agreed!
motie_d wrote: > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Arguments against US corn and soybean biofuel seems > > outlandish IF it boosts bushel price due to increased > > demand thus lowering US gov't subsidize payments > > helping to balance US deficits > > You can take my discussion points as either for or against, depending > on your perspective. I agree with the use of EXCESS crop production > being used for energy purposes. I dislike the inefficiencies of it. > If farmers are going to grow energy crops, I think they should be > growing Sugar Beets for Ethanol, or several alternative higher- > yielding Oil Crops instead of Soybeans. I think it is foolish to grow > Corn with the intention to produce Ethanol from it. If the corn has > been grown for feed, and has been overproduced, of course it should > be converted instead of left to rot. > > Have I thoroughly confused everyone yet? > > Motie > > > > > and > > > > I would think the savings might provide synergy for > > invested interest in further development of the > > next big oil bonanza. > > > > Maybe a gov't.inc revenue restructuring > > without further citizen tax dollar giveaways > > and perhaps a boost for business/job development. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Stock for $4 and no minimums. FREE Money 2002. http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/