http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/20579/story.htm

California votes to weaken tough auto emissions goals

USA: April 28, 2003

SAN FRANCISCO - Faced with tough auto industry opposition, California 
officials voted last week to further scale back the nation's first 
mandate requiring automakers to deliver so-called zero emissions 
vehicles.

The California Air Resources Board voted 8-3 to lower the number of 
these vehicles that must be on California roads by 2005 while also 
allowing car manufacturers to produce fuel cell cars rather than just 
electric ones to meet the requirements.

"What the board did was modify the existing program," said Richard 
Varenchik, a spokesman for the board. "They did that by offering 
manufacturers two ways to meet the mandate - either through fuel 
cells or battery-operated vehicles."

The politically appointed board's decision marks the latest turn in 
the long road to require car makers to offer zero emissions or 
low-polluting vehicles to drivers in the nation's most populous state.

A spokesman for the Alliance for Automobile Manufacturers could not 
immediately be reached but the group has argued against the 
regulations in the past on grounds that few want battery-operated 
vehicles.

Environmental groups had mixed reactions. While disappointed 
officials once again weakened the rules, a spokesman for one 
environmental group said there were also fears the board would accept 
a staff proposal to eliminate increasing the requirements beyond 2008.

"The important step the board took today was ensuring that an 
increasing number of zero emission cars will be delivered to 
California," said Jason Mark, a spokesman for the Union of Concerned 
Scientists. "Hopefully this is the last step before the rules 
actually go into effect."

LEGAL WRANGLING

In 1990, the board jolted the automobile industry by announcing plans 
to require a full 10 percent or an estimated 100,000 of the new cars 
sold in California in 2003 to be zero emissions vehicles - a goal 
which auto producers quickly and repeatedly attacked as unreasonable.

Legal wrangling, however, kept the mandate from taking effect and the 
board softened the proposed regulations over the years. California 
lowered the requirement for zero emission vehicles to 2 percent in 
2001 but the auto industry won a preliminary injunction to block the 
revised rules.

In response, the state rewrote the regulations and approved new ones 
last week that should sweep away the legal challenge although they 
also lower the required number of zero emissions vehicles, Mark said.

"The state has removed the legal question marks and restored the 
programs," he added. "It can now go into effect in 2005."

The board's decision means car makers will have to deliver at least 
250 fuel cell cars - which generally run on hydrogen - or larger 
numbers of battery-powered vehicles by 2008. The target rises to 
27,500 by 2014, according to the air resources board spokesman.

This is less than the estimated 30,000 zero emissions vehicles that 
would have been required by 2010 under the 2001 rules had taken 
effect.

In addition, the program calls for the industry to provide a 
percentage of low-pollution cars such as hybrids by 2010 based on a 
percentage of the automakers' sales in the state. Environmental 
groups estimated that figure at 125,000 compared to only 70,000 under 
the 2001 regulations.

Story by Michael Kahn

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading!
Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/cjB9SD/od7FAA/AG3JAA/9bTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to