http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/7711

Guzzling Down 

James Cotter is a news, arts and culture reporter at WRTI-FM in Philadelphia.

Philadelphia: The federal government regulates SUVs as trucks for the 
purposes of fuel consumption and emissions standards. This is the 
legal loophole that has allowed auto manufactures to sell large 
capacity engine SUVs -- which are, in fact, quasi-luxury passenger 
cars -- without following the rules governing the efficiency and 
safety of traditional large cars.

This has led to a sea-change in what America drives. And today, more 
than one in four private vehicles sold in this country is an SUV.

Cunningly marketed and slickly advertised, SUVs appeal to the 
outdoorsman, the rugged individual to which many consumers would seem 
to aspire. In reality, of course, most SUVs are driven by city 
dwellers and never venture off urban roads.

In more prosperous times... state governments were enthusiastic 
purchasers of SUVs.

In more prosperous times, city and state governments were 
enthusiastic purchasers of SUVs too, buying them not for their truck 
characteristics, but as perks for senior officials. But that is 
starting to change.

In Massachusetts, Gov. Mitt Romney has canceled the gas-guzzling 
habit as he deals with the state's $3 billion budget deficit. Romney 
has asked why the state should fund a fleet of SUVs when regular 
sedans, which sell for less than half the price of SUVs, and which 
are considerably cheaper to run, maintain and insure, would equally 
suffice.

Philadelphia is believed to have one of the largest city fleets of 
SUVs in the nation. But under Mayor John Streets' administration, it 
too has begun disposing of those vehicles not required for off-road 
activities. One example of unnecessary SUV activity was found at 
Philadelphia International Airport, where, until recently, a Hummer 
H2 was being used to scare birds off the runway.

At the state level, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell has promised to look 
into an anomaly that allows sports utility vehicles, designated as 
trucks by federal law, to enter Philadelphia's Fairmont Park, where 
no trucks are permitted.

Pennsylvania state law designates SUVs as passenger vehicles rather 
than trucks. They are therefore not subject to laws prohibiting 
trucks from entering the park, despite being exempt from the stricter 
federal fuel consumption and emissions standards imposed on cars.

Gov. Rendell says he understands the confusion and believes the 
inconsistency, particularly where it applies to larger SUVS, warrants 
his attention.

Gov. Ed Rendell:

If you ask most SUV owners what it is, I think conceptually in their 
minds they're just buying another car, they're not buying a truck. 
But in terms of the reason that a truck is not allowed on a road like 
Lincoln Drive -- does that reason apply to an SUV, and to certainly 
some of the bigger SUVS? Maybe it should. So that's something, to be 
honest, I've never thought about, but something we ought to look at, 
absolutely, because some of the big ones they're building now are 
every bit as big as an ordinary pickup truck. So we should look at 
that.

Signs at entrances to Lincoln Drive, which is within the boundaries 
of Fairmont Park, clearly read "No Trucks."

Joseph Minott, executive director of the Pennsylvania Clean Air 
Council, a non-profit environmental organization, believes larger 
sports utility vehicles should not be allowed to have it both ways, 
saying his organization strongly favors registering and treating 
heavy duty SUVS as trucks, and keeping them off roads such as Lincoln 
Drive which, he says, are clearly for cars.

Recently, the U.S. Transportation Department ratified stricter fuel 
economy standards for SUVs. Beginning with the 2007 year model light 
trucks, the category under which SUVs continue to be assessed will 
have to achieve a minimum of 22.2 miles per gallon, an increase of 
1.5 mpg over the current requirement, but still far short of the 25.7 
mpg mandated for passenger sedans.

The U.S. House also recently rejected a proposal to require a modest 
5 percent across-the-board improvement in automobile fuel efficiency. 
This, while voting to allow drilling in the Alaskan Wildlife refuge, 
a move later sensibly rejected by the U.S. Senate.

A bill sponsored by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California 
and Olympia Snowe, a Republican from Maine, proposes to close the gap 
between SUV and passenger car fuel economy requirements. The proposed 
legislation calls for SUVs to achieve the same fuel efficiency 
standards as cars by 2011. That would save, they say, one million 
barrels of oil a day and reduce dependence on foreign imports by 10 
percent. The likelihood, however, of even this modest proposal making 
it into law would seem decidedly slim in the current political 
climate.

This all takes place in the wake of the Bush administration's 
three-fold increases in tax incentives for small businesses. These 
incentives are purportedly to assist farmers and tradesmen as, 
supposedly, were the original exemptions from emissions and fuel 
efficiency standards for light trucks.

In reality, the new regulations, which increase the deduction for 
purchases of machinery from $25,000 to $75,000 per year, could see 
the owner of your local nail salon, convenience store or dry cleaners 
riding around in a now government-subsidized luxury SUV, while 
drivers of thrifty gas-electric hybrid cars get a miserly $4,000 tax 
break!

This is James Cotter for TomPaine.com.


Published: May 12 2003

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YoVfrB/XP.FAA/uetFAA/9bTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to