Mike Weaver wrote:

>And a double flat tax on inherited wealth!  Or something. 
>
>In the US it pays to have "high prenatal intelligence." Pick rich parents.
>  
>
Why tax it as anything more thne income? Income is income. If you start 
with "oh this shoudl be taxed like this
and that should be taxed that way" you will end up right back where we are.

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
>
>>this is so off base it's not even funny.
>>
Please tell me what you feel is off base (and what base would this be, 
the topic?)

>>  i could go on at length about this, 
>>    
>>
Please do.

>>jeromie, but i think i can boil that message down, adn save a lot of 
>>bandwidth,
>>
Stop by irc.dal.net  #computers I am Crackers`n`Soup and we can save 
some list bandwidth

>> by agreeing with you on one point:  you're right, definitely not a humble 
>>opinion.
>>    
>>
I will eat crow when it is called for. Tell then, I speak as I see it. I 
will not change my point of view unless something
is presented to me for such a action. To date the only way that has 
happened is via communication.

Jeromie

>>-chris b.
>>
>>
>>In a message dated 8/30/05 11:26:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>    
>>


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to