It is amazing how the whole thing follows the "fire in parliament", during AH's coming to power. In that case they also "show" tried and convicted a mentally disturbed janitor for it. Does it rings, thinking of current "show" trial of a clearly and officially confirmed mentally retarded person.
Hakan At 19:41 12/04/2006, you wrote: >Dear D. Mindock > >You seem to be ignoring the central point - if the 'CIA' wanted to >blow up the twin towers, why didn't they just put a huge truck bomb >underneath them? The only reason to hijack planes and crash them >into the WTC is if you really are a fanatical terrorist operating >under cover in the US. Furthermore, the hijackers almost certainly >told their escorts and FAA people that they were returning to the >airport - in which case the fighter jets would have been unlikely to >shoot them down (killing hundreds of US citizens in the >process). Again, the question is why weren't the airlines >warned? Why wasn't security increased? Why weren't numerous and >repeated FBI memos from field agents to headquarters acted on? What >did the President know, and when did he know it? Well? > >Peter I. Solem ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >"D. Mindock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I.S., > So why did Building 7 go down? It wasn't hit by anything except > some falling debris from >the towers. Why was the 757 that hit the Pentagon only able to make >a 16 ft diameter >hole, perfectly round? Why were all military planes kept from >stopping the errant planes >before they hit the towers. FAA controllers saw the planes deviate >and then switch off >their transponders. Look, if any one bit of the puzzle is totally >out of place in the >official rendition of the puzzle, the whole thing collapses. > The Loose Change video brings up points, lots of them, that > BushCo would not like to be made >public. One is that there were large explosions in the lobbies of >the towers and on other >floors before the towers started to come down. There are witnesses >to this. (Maybe by >now these witnesses all have a different song to sing after being >visited by whatever.) To say >that it is disinfo doesn't make any sense. To me it is a very tight >expose. It adds accelerant to >the fire. BTW, Loose Change is referred to on the ><http://www.911truth.org/>www.911truth.org site. > The question is: How much do we need to know before a Conspiracy > Theory becomes a >Conspiracy Fact? I believe we now have more than enough to charge >Bush/Cheney with >crimes against humanity. >Peace, D. Mindock >----- Original Message ----- >From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Martin Kemple >To: <mailto:Biofuel@sustainablelists.org>Biofuel@sustainablelists.org >Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:57 PM >Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Loose Change -- new video sheds new light on >9/11 -second thoughts > >These are all good points, I.S. >For more skepticism on "Loose Change", see: ><http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/12/1787340.php>http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/12/1787340.php >and a number of websites cited therein. >I haven't sorted it all through yet, and even the above site could >itself be a dupe. Who knows? >Bottom line for me, though, is that we already have more than enough >goods to send up Bush-Cheney. (And always remember to include them >both together. Surely, Cheney is Dr. Strangeglove incarnate. Hell, I >wouldn't be surprised if Deadeye Dick's got stock in the "Impeach >Bush" brigade, if not masterminding it....) >Make no mistake, Cheney's gotta go too; even moreso. Bush is the >stooge-monkey playing the accordion in front of the audience. >-Martin K. > >On Apr 11, 2006, at 4:10 PM, I. S. wrote: > >At the risk of generating a huge amount of hate mail, I have to >point out that Bush's real crime was ignoring the FBI warnings as >well as failing to act on the August 6th presidential daily briefing >titled "Osama Bin Ladin determined to strike inside US". No warning >to the airlines - why not? If Bush deliberately allowed terrorists >to make a strike on US soil, isn't that alone grounds for >impeachment and charges of treason? > >Think a little bit, folks! - if the CIA or some other government >agency wanted to fake a terrorist attack on US soil, all they'd have >to do is park four huge truck bombs under the WTC, scatter some Arab >corpses around with "Holy Jihad" letters, and blow the thing up. No >need for elaborate bombs in the WTC, planes being hijacked, missles >hitting the Pentagon, etc. However, if fanatical Al Queda recruits >motivated by US occupation of Saudi soil, the Israeli-Palestine >conflict, and fundamentalist ideology wanted to do this, planes seem >the only way they could have done it - with the deliberate blind eye >of Bush to assist them, that is. > >Loose Change in my opinion is a government produced disinformation >film designed to produce deep divisions within the anti-war and >impeach-bush movements; it is also designed to drive a wedge between >9/11 families and other protestors. This is the essence of many >government propaganda / disinformation campaigns. Compare it to the >NOVA special on the collapse of the twin towers, and JUDGE FOR YOURSELF! > ><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/<?/color> > >Now, I'm perfectly willing to admit I could be wrong - unlike the >"9/11 Truth Networks", I hold that careful analysis and independent >thinking are prerequisites for any investigation. However, I think >that the evidence show that Bush was forewarned about 9/11 and >deliberately failed to act. The question should be this: "What did >the President and his advisors know, and when did they know it?" I >believe that the answer to that simple question would lead to the >impeachment of Bush on charges of treason. > >Peter I. Solem > >Michael Redler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >I've done some research on events discussed in this video. The facts >about Operation North Woods was in fact discussed in Noam Chomsky's >book Hegemony or Survival. It has a lot of credible information. > >In a documentary, it's absolutely critical to be accurate with ALL >YOUR RESEARCH. > >On July 28th, 1945, a B-25 crashed into the Empire State Building - >NOT A B-52! I doubt that the B-52 was even in development in 1945. > >S**T!!! That's frustrating! > >Mike > >"D. Mindock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > ><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param >0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger> <?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily> ><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param >0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>The video brings up new info that I've >not seen before. The video makers did do a lot of work to pull a lot >sources together. The 9/11<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily> ><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param >0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>tradgedy was, in spite of all the >effort by the gov, a bungled job. It doesn't stand up to intelligent >scrutiny. Now it is our job to<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily> ><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param >0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>get the disgusting thugs out of office >and into prison. They (Bush/Cheney/et. al.) ARE the real enemy >combatants. Peace, D. Mindock<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily> ><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param >0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger> <?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily> ><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param >0000,0000,8080><?x-tad-bigger>[snip]<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?/fontfamily> _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
