I'm inclined to support Bruno's position here. The thing with most conspiracies 
is that they are redundant: the result may be achieved more safely, surely, and 
cheaply by provocation and manipulation than by sneaking about pretending to be 
someone else. I certainly believe that there are conspiracies out there: in 
fact I believe there are a far greater number of conspiracies than the average 
conspiracy theorist believes in, but they are uncoordinated and contrary to one 
another. People whisper to one another behind closed doors all the time, and 
not only amorously. Just last night my wife and I were speculating on how one 
could paint-bomb Julius Malema (q.v.). Where I baulk is the single, unified 
conspiracy to rule them all.

That said, I would be very surprised indeed if the Official Version of the 11/9 
events did not deviate significantly from the truth. I think there are those 
among the powers that be who are all the happier the more wrong trees 
conspiracy theorists bark up: and I would go as far as to wonder if the exact 
detail is all that important.

If I have learned anything it is that living sanely means being able to deal 
sanely with the unknown - and the unknown is huge. Denying the unknown, or 
denying the importance or ambit of the unknown, or the unknowable, is a popular 
attitude especially among those who are supposed to have some understanding of 
things. "Focus on what we do know," they say, and if they do not positively 
assert that the unknown and the unknowable do not exist they are at least 
satisfied to ignore them. It's all Hume's fault. Without the pervasive 
assumption of Humean phenomenalism as an attitude the world would not have 
considered Heisenberg's uncertainty principle remarkable enough to name after 
someone. As it is three bullshit artists out of every five come across all 
sophic and sagacious by bunging quantum mechanics in somewhere. But I digress.

Knowing that there are around seventy-four theories of which either an unknown 
one or none at all may be true is sufficient to develop a sane stance. It does 
not, should not, affect one's understanding of what is right, correct, 
beneficial, or desirable: those cannot arise purely from empirical observation. 
But they will tell us which questions we want answered; and in those terms the 
vast bulk of the conspiracy theorists' questions are neither here nor there.

Regards

Dawie Coetzee





>________________________________
>From: Bruno M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
>Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011, 18:47
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Make this the LAST Aniversary of the Bush/Cheney 9/11 
>Media Fairy Tale !
>
>Paul, do you really 'believe' this 9-11 conspiracy crap ?
>
>I ( may i say 'We'?) are not Bush fans, but,
>
>if it was all a set-up ( an inside job) it would involve at least a few 
>hundred people,
>( thousands if also the first responders had to keep quit)
>and could it then be, that even after ten years not 1 of them feels remorse,
>and came out of the closet and tell the truth, or wikileak it?
>
>Many Americans are so blind to what happens in the world ( outside the USA),
>that they don't can grasp the idea that the USA just got what they asked 
>for,
>harvested what they sowed.
>
>To educate yourself, and be able to find more truth,
>at least read what the others have to say, it may open your eyes.
>Just a few to get you started:
>http://www.debunking911.com/
>http://www.sawyerhome.net/whatilearned.html
>http://www.alternet.org/story/41601/
>
>
>Grts
>Bruno M.
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
><snip>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20110915/5c1f998b/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to